
01:04:02
That is a great idea. Actually, there are journals that celebrate the top reviewers by just acknowledging their efforts as outstanding reviewers. Typically, they select 10 reviewers and send them just a certificate. This could be another way to incentive getting good reviews for the ASC conference proceedings.

01:05:49
Support the "Top Reviewer" approach. Thanks. Also, is it usually viewed favorably or less or ambivalent about multiple authors or authors across multiple programs?

01:05:49
Great point, Richard. Also, by identifying the better reviewers, those of us who have less experience are able to reach out to the more experienced reviewers as mentors.

01:07:28
Re: Rubric - Perfect!\

01:08:08
https://auburn.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wQX0XXouiSDuxn

01:10:44
Thank you Tom, Anthony, and Wes. I appreciate so much your attempt to elevate the reviews and enhance the value of the ASC Proceedings.

01:11:52
Thank you, Tom, Anthony, and Wes, for the initiatives and informative presentation.

01:11:58
Thank you.

01:12:07
Thanks everyone!

01:12:08
Thank you all

01:12:10
Thank you for a great presentation.

01:12:16
thank you!

01:12:17
Thank you!

01:12:19
Thank you!

01:12:28
thanks