That is a great idea. Actually, there are journals that celebrate the top reviewers by just acknowledging their efforts as outstanding reviewers. Typically, they select 10 reviewers and send them just a certificate. This could be another way to incentive getting good reviews for the ASC conference proceedings.

Support the "Top Reviewer" approach. Thanks. Also, is it usually viewed favorably or less or ambivalent about multiple authors or authors across multiple programs?

Great point, Richard. Also, by identifying the better reviewers, those of us who have less experience are able to reach out to the more experienced reviewers as mentors.

Re: Rubric - Perfect!\

https://auburn.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wQX0XXouiSDuxn

Thank you Tom, Anthony, and Wes. I appreciate so much your attempt to elevate the reviews and enhance the value of the ASC Proceedings.

Thank you, Tom, Anthony, and Wes, for the initiatives and informative presentation.

Thank you.

Thanks everyone!

Thank you all

Thank you for a great presentation.

thank you!

Thank you!

Thank you!

thanks