Logo

ASC 2021 Proceedings Reviewer Webinar - Shared screen with speaker view
R. Valdes
01:04:02
That is a great idea. Actually, there are journals that celebrate the top reviewers by just acknowledging their efforts as outstanding reviewers. Typically, they select 10 reviewers and send them just a certificate. This could be another way to incentive getting good reviews for the ASC conference proceedings.
Suermann, Patrick C
01:05:49
Support the "Top Reviewer" approach. Thanks. Also, is it usually viewed favorably or less or ambivalent about multiple authors or authors across multiple programs?
Kimberly Baylor Bivins
01:05:49
Great point, Richard. Also, by identifying the better reviewers, those of us who have less experience are able to reach out to the more experienced reviewers as mentors.
Kimberly Baylor Bivins
01:07:28
Re: Rubric - Perfect!\
Wes Collins
01:08:08
https://auburn.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wQX0XXouiSDuxn
Ben Farrow
01:10:44
Thank you Tom, Anthony, and Wes. I appreciate so much your attempt to elevate the reviews and enhance the value of the ASC Proceedings.
Sandeep Langar
01:11:52
Thank you, Tom, Anthony, and Wes, for the initiatives and informative presentation.
Mohan Siriwardena (LJMU)
01:11:58
Thank you.
Jeff Kim - Auburn, AL US
01:12:07
Thanks everyone!
Sanjeev Adhikari
01:12:08
Thank you all
Kimberly Baylor Bivins
01:12:10
Thank you for a great presentation.
Amirali Shalwani
01:12:16
thank you!
Boshra Karimi
01:12:17
Thank you!
Abimbola Windapo
01:12:19
Thank you!
Alan Bond
01:12:28
thanks